+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: future of BB pro

  • Thread Tools
    • Show Printable Version
    • Email this Page…
    • Subscribe to this Thread…
  • Display
    • Switch to Hybrid Mode
    • Switch to Threaded Mode
  1. #1
    janvg
    • View Profile
    • View Forum Posts
    • Private Message
    janvg is offlineJunior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    14

    Question future of BB pro

    Chris,
    Can you tell us something more about the direction BBP will be going in the future? Which new features can we expect?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Chris Breeze is offlineAdministrator
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5,112

    Default

    I'm currently working on image ranking and then plan to enhance the raw conversion (e.g. saving settings, batch conversion, cropping).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    RRRoger
    • View Profile
    • View Forum Posts
    • Visit Homepage
    RRRoger is offlineMember
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Prunedale, California
    Posts
    34

    Default BBpro Update & Beta files

    Hi Chris,

    I understand that there is a BBPro v1.1 version. Where can I download files?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Evo2Me
    • View Profile
    • View Forum Posts
    • Private Message
    • Visit Homepage
    Evo2Me is offlineSenior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hamburg (Germany)
    Posts
    117

    Default

    QuoteOriginally Posted by RRRoger
    I understand that there is a BBPro v1.1 version. Where can I download files?
    1.0.1, right on the home page of BreezeSystems.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    RRRoger
    • View Profile
    • View Forum Posts
    • Visit Homepage
    RRRoger is offlineMember
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Prunedale, California
    Posts
    34

    Default BreezeBrowser 1.01

    Yes, sign me up for the class.

    Thanks, Roger M.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    olearydj
    • View Profile
    • View Forum Posts
    • Private Message
    olearydj is offlineJunior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10

    Default

    And you are going to release BBP 1.1 as soon as the image ranking work is done, right?! Pretty please?!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Chris Breeze is offlineAdministrator
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5,112

    Default

    I hope to have a beta version with ranking soon. I'd prefer to release it as a beta and get some feedback.
    BTW I'll be out of the office all next week and hope to have the beta ready in about two week's time.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    gunars
    • View Profile
    • View Forum Posts
    • Private Message
    gunars is offlineJunior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    27

    Default Image ranking

    What I'd like to see is the ability to assign a rank of say 1 to 5 to each image with facilities to copy/move images with a particular rank. A filtered display by rank (i.e. show only images that are rank 2, show all unranked images, etc) would be useful. (Yes, this is similar to what Pixort does.)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Hogleg 44
    • View Profile
    • View Forum Posts
    • Private Message
    Hogleg 44 is offlineJunior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    North Richland Hills TX
    Posts
    10

    Default

    QuoteOriginally Posted by Chris Breeze
    I'm currently working on image ranking and then plan to enhance the raw conversion (e.g. saving settings, batch conversion, cropping).
    Chris,

    Could you expand a little on your plans to "enhance the raw conversion".

    I am considering upgrading to Pro. I really like your conversion output but it takes so long.
    I have a P4, 2.4, 1GB ram, XP Home, in a Raid-0 configuration.
    Last night I converted about 70+ 1DmkII images and it took nearly 2 hours total. The average image conversion time was 69 seconds. Then I had to go back and separately convert another 6 images with different exposures one at a time. The conversion time wouldn't be a problem if I could get back to my desktop and work on something else. I can't minimize your program. I have to bring other items over top of it. The conversion process pretty much takes over my computer and makes it really too slow to do anything else.

    Is it me...Am I doing something wrong? If it isn't me, will my issues be improved with the planned enhancements?

    Please comment...

    Thanks,
    Paul A. Valentine
    Valentine Services

    Canon Fan DSLR+
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Chris Breeze is offlineAdministrator
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5,112

    Default

    69 secs per image sounds way too long. My 2.4GHz AMD WinXP Pro PC takes approximately 14 secs per image to convert 1D Mark II raw files to JPEGs with no post processing. Smart noise reduction and post processing (resizing, levels, sharpening etc.) will add to the conversion time.
    My 3.0GHz Pentium HT system takes around 10 secs per image. Both PCs have 1Gb RAM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts