+ Reply to Thread
-
January 22nd, 2005 12:29 PM #1
future of BB pro
Chris,
Can you tell us something more about the direction BBP will be going in the future? Which new features can we expect?
-
January 24th, 2005 12:39 PM #2
I'm currently working on image ranking and then plan to enhance the raw conversion (e.g. saving settings, batch conversion, cropping).
-
January 24th, 2005 01:18 PM #3
BBpro Update & Beta files
Hi Chris,
I understand that there is a BBPro v1.1 version. Where can I download files?
-
January 24th, 2005 02:58 PM #4
Originally Posted by
RRRoger
I understand that there is a BBPro v1.1 version. Where can I download files?
1.0.1, right on the home page of BreezeSystems.
-
January 27th, 2005 05:00 PM #5
BreezeBrowser 1.01
Yes, sign me up for the class.
Thanks, Roger M.
-
January 27th, 2005 11:14 PM #6
And you are going to release BBP 1.1 as soon as the image ranking work is done, right?! Pretty please?!
-
January 28th, 2005 10:53 AM #7
I hope to have a beta version with ranking soon. I'd prefer to release it as a beta and get some feedback.
BTW I'll be out of the office all next week and hope to have the beta ready in about two week's time.
-
January 28th, 2005 05:21 PM #8
Image ranking
What I'd like to see is the ability to assign a rank of say 1 to 5 to each image with facilities to copy/move images with a particular rank. A filtered display by rank (i.e. show only images that are rank 2, show all unranked images, etc) would be useful. (Yes, this is similar to what Pixort does.)
-
February 10th, 2005 03:02 PM #9
Originally Posted by
Chris Breeze
I'm currently working on image ranking and then plan to enhance the raw conversion (e.g. saving settings, batch conversion, cropping).
Chris,
Could you expand a little on your plans to "enhance the raw conversion".
I am considering upgrading to Pro. I really like your conversion output but it takes so long.
I have a P4, 2.4, 1GB ram, XP Home, in a Raid-0 configuration.
Last night I converted about 70+ 1DmkII images and it took nearly 2 hours total. The average image conversion time was 69 seconds. Then I had to go back and separately convert another 6 images with different exposures one at a time. The conversion time wouldn't be a problem if I could get back to my desktop and work on something else. I can't minimize your program. I have to bring other items over top of it. The conversion process pretty much takes over my computer and makes it really too slow to do anything else.
Is it me...Am I doing something wrong? If it isn't me, will my issues be improved with the planned enhancements?
Please comment...
Thanks,
Paul A. Valentine
Valentine Services
Canon Fan DSLR+
-
February 10th, 2005 03:32 PM #10
69 secs per image sounds way too long. My 2.4GHz AMD WinXP Pro PC takes approximately 14 secs per image to convert 1D Mark II raw files to JPEGs with no post processing. Smart noise reduction and post processing (resizing, levels, sharpening etc.) will add to the conversion time.
My 3.0GHz Pentium HT system takes around 10 secs per image. Both PCs have 1Gb RAM.
+ Reply to Thread
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules